All gas no batteries, please and thank you.

http://www.diseno-art.com/encyclopedia/concept_cars/mitsubishi_eclipse_concept-E.html

4Kbeast: Thanks for the warranty info.

Besides that, in California emissions states you get a 10-year/150k mi warranty on the battery. Even if you aren’t in a California emissions state, you get a 8-year/100k mi warranty.

shouldn’t sport car standard to improve by now? i hope they do beat that FQ400. maybe it’s a bit pricey, but it’s a sport car (more performance mean more money goes out of pocket). hope that toyota try something out of ordinary with their hybrid engine. this concept is on my watchlist…

i don’t mean to be negative about this issue, but do any motoring company that try to compare one hybrid car and another normal petrol head car? so far only honda bring out both engine for civic. the question is was the performance wise same for both car? for urban use, yeah, hybrid score is unbelievably good, for total comparison? for me rather than they announce that new nsx will use hybrid engine, it’s better they develop that engine until it run head to head with other petrol head engine. i mean for sure those ferrari, lambo, pagani, and many more take notice about hybrid tech, but even this year they still bring out those petrol gluttony engine. doesn’t this mean that they not sure whether hybrid engine is good enough to wear their badge, and continue to research until hybrid engine fulfill their expectation?

in fact, i don’t mind hybrid engine at all, i mean for urban use it’s more than welcome. i also accept k-car because for me, it’s suitable for urban use. but k-car also has good performance wise since it’s power to weight ratio is good. do hybrid car is the same?

how about we goes like this. the moment someone bring out hybrid engine for sports car using new badge and beat it’s class for good, i don’t mind those motoring company using old badge for their new hybrid sport car.